Temploracraft
← All role guides

The HR & Talent Acquisition resume: every KPI, formula, and pattern

Talent Acquisition SpecialistTechnical RecruiterHR GeneralistHR Business PartnerRecruitment Lead
Score your resume against this →Use the HR & Talent Acquisition template

The 7 numbers that carry this resume

Every hr & talent acquisition bullet gets stronger with one of these. The benchmark tells you what's worth claiming; the question helps you dig your real number out.

Closures vs targethires per quarter against plan; "38 of 35 targeted" reads instantly

How many positions did you close per quarter/year, against what target?

Time-to-fill45–60 days typical for tech; any reduction with the mechanism is strong

What was your average time-to-fill, and what did you cut it from?

Offer-to-join ratio80%+ in India tech is genuinely elite — say how you got there

What share of your offers actually joined? What did you do about drop-offs?

Pipeline conversionsourced→screen→offer ratios show craft, not luck

Of 100 sourced profiles, how many reached screens and offers? Better than team norm?

Cost per hire / agency mixshifting hires from agencies to direct sourcing is a money bullet

Did you reduce agency dependence? What % of hires were direct-sourced, saving what?

Attrition / retention (HR track)early attrition (90-day) reductions carry the most weight

Did attrition drop in your population after something you ran? From what to what?

Scalerequisitions handled, headcount supported, stakeholders served

How many open roles at once, for how large an org or business unit?

Bullet formulas

Structure first, wording second. Fill the brackets with your own numbers.

  1. Strong verb + roles/program + scale + metric against target or baseline.
  2. Weak: "Handled end-to-end recruitment for various positions." Strong: "Closed 38 engineering roles in FY24 (target 35) at a 52-day average time-to-fill, with 86% offer-to-join through structured pre-join engagement."
  3. HR-generalist bullets follow the same shape with people metrics: attrition, eNPS, grievance turnaround, payroll accuracy.

Verbs that read like ownership

hiring
Closed · Sourced · Screened · Pipelined · Converted
speed
Accelerated · Compressed · Streamlined · Unblocked
partnering
Advised · Calibrated · Partnered · Negotiated · Influenced
programs
Launched · Institutionalized · Ran · Scaled · Revamped
people
Onboarded · Retained · Engaged · Coached · Resolved
operations
Automated · Digitized · Audited · Standardized

Weak phrase → stronger pattern

handled end-to-end recruitmentClosed [N] roles in [period] (target [M]) at [X]-day TTF and [Y%] offer-to-join

End-to-end is the process everyone runs; closures against target are the result.

sourced candidatesSourced [600]/quarter via [channels]; [1-in-6] reached screens vs a [1-in-12] norm

Volume with a conversion ratio shows craft; volume alone shows effort.

coordinated interviewsRan SLA-based scheduling across [12] panels — zero candidate reschedules from our side in [period]

Coordination is invisible until you attach the reliability it produced.

maintained the ATSKept [ATS] pipeline hygiene at [100%] stage-accuracy, powering the weekly hiring dashboard leadership runs on

Data entry is a chore; a dashboard leadership trusts is an asset.

reduced attritionCut 90-day attrition [14% → 6%] via [onboarding rebuild/stay interviews] across [population]

Attrition claims need the window, the population, and the mechanism.

engagement activitiesRan [program]; participation [82%], eNPS [+18] over two cycles

Activities are calendar items — participation and eNPS are what they were for.

Keywords screens look for

talent acquisitiontime-to-filloffer-to-joinsourcingATSstakeholder managementemployer brandingonboardingattritionengagementHR operationscampus hiringdiversity hiringcompensation

Use the ones that are true for you — keyword stuffing reads as noise to a human on the other side. The studio tracks your coverage live.

Before you send it

  • Closures against target with the year — the recruiter equivalent of quota attainment
  • Offer-to-join ratio and what you actively do about drop-offs (the India-market differentiator)
  • Direct-vs-agency mix with the fee savings — TA leaders manage to that line
  • Roles hired FOR named (SDE, data, sales) — recruiters are screened for domain fluency
  • Your ATS and sourcing stack named exactly; Boolean fluency mentioned if genuinely strong
  • For HRBP-track: one business problem you solved with a people lever, told with numbers
  • Confidentiality-safe framing: percentages and ratios where absolute headcount is sensitive

See how your resume scores against this guide

Free instant check — the same engine, no sign-up, nothing stored.

Check my resume →